2006 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Omega

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 52 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Uplander.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Uplander (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Uplander 1983 Oldsmobile Omega
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Uplander Omega
Year Released 2006 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3490 cc 2474 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 201 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 293 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1078 kg 1130 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2670 mm