2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 333 kg more than 2006 Chrysler 300.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler 300 | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 300 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 2206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 107 L |
