2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 300 | 66 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |