2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 489 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | 300 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2680 mm |