2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler 300. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler 300.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | 300 | FTO |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |