2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler 300. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler 300.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler 300 | 1998 Acura TL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | 300 | TL |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2840 mm |
