2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 6,064 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (276 HP @ 9000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 300 | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6064 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |