2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 607 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 300 | Equator |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3260 mm |
