2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 TVR Tamora
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 TVR Tamora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 TVR Tamora would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (336 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2000 TVR Tamora. (334 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 TVR Tamora. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 643 kg more than 2000 TVR Tamora. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 TVR Tamora. (514 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 TVR Tamora.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2000 TVR Tamora | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | 300 | Tamora |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 336 HP | 334 HP |
Torque | 525 Nm | 514 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 1230 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 57 L |