2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |