2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (215 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (510 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler 300 | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 300 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
