2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 300 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 110 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 61 L |