2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (250 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 300 | Cruze |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2685 mm |