2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.

Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler 300.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler 300 2012 Honda CR-V
Make Chrysler Honda
Model 300 CR-V
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2736 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 148 HP
Torque 258 Nm 350 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4554 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1819 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1679 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 58 L