2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Leaf |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |