2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Chrysler | Mini |
Model | 300 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |