2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost

To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher.

Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost (780 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler 300. (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler 300.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler 300 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
Make Chrysler Rolls-Royce
Model 300 Ghost
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 425 HP 0 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 570 Nm 780 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 8-speed automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 5569 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1948 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 3465 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 82 L