2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher.
Because 2006 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | 300 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 1867 mm |