2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |