2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Seat |
| Model | Crossfire | 600 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
