2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 767 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Crossfire | Elan |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |