2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1975 TVR M
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR M would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 725 kg more than 1975 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1975 TVR M | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | Crossfire | M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2290 mm |