2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 810 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire has automatic transmission and 1978 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossfire | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2310 mm |
