2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 715 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | Crossfire | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |