2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 278 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Crossfire | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.3 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |