2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossfire | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2972 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 95 L |
