2006 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 920 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chrysler | Fisker |
| Model | Crossfire | Karma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 36 L |
