2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2280 mm |
