2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1963 DKW Junior
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1963 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1963 DKW Junior | |
| Make | Chrysler | DKW |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Junior |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2180 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 31 L |
