2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 775 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chrysler | Sunbeam |
Model | Grand Voyager | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4810 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 27 L |