2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 995 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 220 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
