2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Grand Voyager | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |