2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 525 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Voyager | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2760 mm |