2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1980 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 435 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1980 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1980 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Grand Voyager | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4810 mm | 2760 mm |