2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Donkervoort |
Model | Grand Voyager | S7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1080 mm |