2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Grand Voyager | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4690 mm |