2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 961 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 954 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4810 mm | 2400 mm |
