2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4810 mm | 2160 mm |
