2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP) has 161 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 181 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Grand Voyager | XJR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 5992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 333 HP |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 89 L |