2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Grand Voyager | TL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2840 mm |