2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1998 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1998 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | Grand Voyager | Polo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2410 mm |