2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Grand Voyager | Tundra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |