2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Navigator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Navigator would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 350 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Grand Voyager | Navigator |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |