2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Voyager | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4810 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |