2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, both 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager and 2006 Renault Clio were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (137 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 755 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 137 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 9.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |