2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Grand Voyager | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 232 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |