2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Galant
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Galant. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Galant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 465 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Galant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2010 Mitsubishi Galant | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Voyager | Galant |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |