2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2011 BMW X3
To start off, 2011 BMW X3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X3 (311 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 80 kg more than 2011 BMW X3.
Because 2011 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2011 BMW X3 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | Grand Voyager | X3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 5.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4648 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1881 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1675 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |