2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 (261 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2013 BMW X5 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | Grand Voyager | X5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4857 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2197 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1776 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 85 L |