2006 Chrysler Neon vs. 2005 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2006 Chrysler Neon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda MPV weights approximately 91 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MPV (271 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Neon.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Neon 2005 Mazda MPV
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Neon MPV
Year Released 2006 2005
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 131 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 178 Nm 271 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1711 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.2 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 75 L